What is the complexity of dijkstra algorithm but without the vis array and without checking for dist array code https://ideone.com/VTaE03
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3856 |
2 | jiangly | 3747 |
3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
6 | gamegame | 3477 |
7 | Benq | 3468 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
10 | heuristica | 3431 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
4 | Um_nik | 158 |
5 | atcoder_official | 157 |
6 | Qingyu | 156 |
7 | adamant | 151 |
7 | djm03178 | 151 |
7 | luogu_official | 151 |
10 | awoo | 146 |
What is the complexity of dijkstra algorithm but without the vis array and without checking for dist array code https://ideone.com/VTaE03
Name |
---|
What's the meaning of
k
in the code?It can be quadratic, for example this directed graph:
Initial node is connected with k nodes (with cost 1), these k nodes are connected with another node (middle)(with costs k, k — 1 , k — 2..., 1). Middle node is connected with another k nodes (with cost 1), which are connected to the final node (with cost oo, a.k.a. big enough).
Certainly middle node will be visited k times, and visiting it requires k operations, as it has k neighbours. So total complexity would be at least
.
If I understood the code correctly it wouldn't be difficult to construct O(2n) in a similar way.