What is the complexity of dijkstra algorithm but without the vis array and without checking for dist array code https://ideone.com/VTaE03
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3839 |
3 | Radewoosh | 3646 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
4 | Benq | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
7 | Geothermal | 3569 |
7 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3494 |
10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | Um_nik | 164 |
2 | maomao90 | 160 |
3 | -is-this-fft- | 159 |
4 | atcoder_official | 158 |
4 | cry | 158 |
4 | awoo | 158 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | nor | 154 |
9 | TheScrasse | 153 |
10 | maroonrk | 152 |
What is the complexity of dijkstra algorithm but without the vis array and without checking for dist array code https://ideone.com/VTaE03
Name |
---|
What's the meaning of
k
in the code?It can be quadratic, for example this directed graph:
Initial node is connected with k nodes (with cost 1), these k nodes are connected with another node (middle)(with costs k, k — 1 , k — 2..., 1). Middle node is connected with another k nodes (with cost 1), which are connected to the final node (with cost oo, a.k.a. big enough).
Certainly middle node will be visited k times, and visiting it requires k operations, as it has k neighbours. So total complexity would be at least .
If I understood the code correctly it wouldn't be difficult to construct O(2n) in a similar way.