tun's blog

By tun, history, 7 years ago, In English

The ordinate indicates workshop ratings(0.0~200.0).

The abscissa indicates World Finals rankings(Only show top 24).

Why do they look so different?

  • Vote: I like it
  • +32
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +71 Vote: I do not like it

Can you label the axes? I don't understand the graphs at all.

  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +5 Vote: I do not like it

    Thanks for your reminding.

»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by tun (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by tun (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +36 Vote: I do not like it

Hello, it seems your graph has missed my team :'(

My team is UET-VNU and we participated in Moscow Workshop under the name "Vietnam NU". We were ranked 15th in the Finals and had a rating of 86.22 in the Workshop.

Nice graph anyway :)

  • »
    »
    7 years ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +8 Vote: I do not like it

    Thanks, it has been corrected.

»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +8 Vote: I do not like it

Maybe it also worth analyzing the relationship between OpenCup results and world final results. And possibly GP-X scores or ranks suits better than ratings.

»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +66 Vote: I do not like it

Not sure if your question "Why do they look so different?" is rhetorical, but the reason is because both samples are too small to conclude anything with high confidence.

»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Auto comment: topic has been updated by tun (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
7 years ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +20 Vote: I do not like it

Trash problemset from this year's WF.