include

6 years ago, # |

+197

Uhh, can't wait til BledDest, Roms and vovuh finally get rid of their new year colors!

→ Reply

vovuh

6 years ago, # ^ |

+260

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Is this comment of yours an intended one to troll not-PikMike? :thinking:

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

+75

Every New Year, most of the codeforces community be like. xD

→ Reply

Aminul-Islam

6 years ago, # ^ |

-27

Anyways, I topped the Rating and Contribution Rank! (In this photo) ;)

Clear pic here: https://i.ibb.co/prVbnK9/Legendary-Grandmaster-Aminul-Islam.jpg

→ Reply

Radebush

6 years ago, # ^ |

+11

Who cares

→ Reply

Adibov

6 years ago, # |

+13

awoo has been problem settler over 50 contest, it's even more than number of contests I've ever participated. Where those problems come from?

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

+41

All of them are from the other members of our team. I prepared lots of problems, however, I only own like 5 ideas of all those contests. The truth hurts!)

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

+17

Well, not all of these problems are ours. Sometimes participants send their ideas about problems, and we prepare them. There are also some problems that are taken from training camps and slightly modified (or even not modified); it was a bit common in some earlier rounds, but now we are trying to avoid such problems (it is not always possible, though).

→ Reply

Adibov

6 years ago, # ^ |

+25

Any way thank you for Educational rounds. ;)

→ Reply

_overrated_

6 years ago, # ^ |

-28

Google)

→ Reply

l-_-l

6 years ago, # |

Ctrl A Ctrl C Ctrl V Compile Activated

→ Reply

tantam75

6 years ago, # |

+30

Is PikMike MikeMirzayanov, since PikMike didn't thank him?

→ Reply

_overrated_

6 years ago, # |

-60

The worst educational round ever!

→ Reply

problem_destroyer420

6 years ago, # |

-15

Weak pretests, my solutions passed >:(

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

+55

Pretests might be weak but you are weaker. You would've found them if you solved G.

→ Reply

problem_destroyer420

6 years ago, # ^ |

:((((((

→ Reply

Jhin

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

+11

it's weird if E is that easy :P maybe that's new year gift from santa PikMike or something

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Jhin just comment out the fast input and submit again

→ Reply

devalfa

6 years ago, # ^ |

Wow man, I got a TLE on 7 when I removed FIO :O

→ Reply

quackdratic

6 years ago, # |

Almost spent an hour implementing segment trees for E, because I thought "an E-graded problem can't be easier than that, right?". Yes, I'm newer around here.

→ Reply

http://codeforces.net/blog/entry/62602

6 years ago, # ^ |

I though the same but after seeing the number of submissions,figured it was probably easy.

→ Reply

Gr8

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

In problem C, I had done sorting of pairs in asscending order and then checking it belongs to which group gives WA on test 3. like this:

for(int i = 1; i < n; i++){

if(v[i].fi > v[i-1].sec){

            ans[i] = 1-ans[i-1];  // swapping grp from 1 to 0 or 0 to 1.
        }
        else{
            ans[i] = ans[i-1];  //keeping it same.
        }
    }

can someone tell me the correct approach for it?

→ Reply

slappy

6 years ago, # ^ |

you have to keep track of max right in current group then compare.

→ Reply

Muhimin_Osim

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

I did the same wrong, but initially got corrected! :)

→ Reply

gfonn

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

Consider this test:

→ Reply

Gr8

6 years ago, # ^ |

It answer is -1, right?

→ Reply

FeggieBoss

6 years ago, # ^ |

Yes, it is

→ Reply

VLADO

6 years ago, # |

So how do you solve F if binary search + greedy is too slow?

→ Reply

Atreus

6 years ago, # ^ |

+18

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

+14

We thought that there would be a lot of solutions with this technique, but to our surprise more people solved it with three-dimensional DP instead.

→ Reply

Vshining

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

I've thought about this too. Does the greedy work though? For the sample test my solution gets 203, which is wrong. P.S. My code: 48258662

→ Reply

VLADO

6 years ago, # ^ |

Wow, that seems like such a simple trick in hindsight. I'll try not to forget it. Thanks!

→ Reply

sdnr1

6 years ago, # |

How to solve problem G? I could only figure out that the answer must be less than 30.

→ Reply

bvd

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 6 →

+19

This is some of my ideas for problem G (I hope it wasn't totally correct because I did not finish coding it :( ) :

1, Calculate the prefix sum array f_i

2, Represent each f_i as a binary vector.

3, Calculate the dimension of the vector space spanned by the vectors that I found in Step 2. If the dimension is 0, print out -1, otherwise print that dimension.

We also need to check if f_n is an element of some basis.

→ Reply

lessmeaning

6 years ago, # ^ |

check if f[n] is an element of some basis is just checking that f[n] != 0, right?

→ Reply

bvd

6 years ago, # ^ |

Yes

→ Reply

fmrozaqi

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 3 →

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

Yeah.

I'm interested in the proof that checking all prefixes is sufficient, though. I couldn't prove it. :/

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Let's say you have 3 values

b[1], b[2], b[3]

Also, c[1] = b[1], c[2] = b[1] ^ b[2], c[3] = b[1] ^ b[2] ^ b[3]

Every possible subset of c's correspond to a unique subset of b's (and vice-versa) so it's the same thing if you take the xor of segments or prefix xor until the end of the segments.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Thanks!

→ Reply

yaksha

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

Won't finding basis using gaussian elimination take O(32*32*N) time? but it still runs fast, I have just learned about Gaussian elimination so I am curious why it runs fast?! Also , it seems intuitively true that answer will be basis, but how can we prove it?!

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

32 * N because you can use bitwise operations (xor). If the numbers are all linearly independent, then there's no subset that xors to 0 so this is the necessary and sufficient condition to be a valid set of segments. Also, every number different from 0 can appear in the answer (just start adding it first). The prefix xor stuff I explained above.

→ Reply

sfialok98

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

If we are asked to give one such division of max number of segments, then we will make division at the positions where we get prefix xor as a new basis element.If ever a segment has xor zero, we need to add some elements from its right or left.. Is it correct..?

→ Reply

https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48253797

6 years ago, # ^ |

First part is correct. Second part is useless since when you add a 0 it won't be added as new element. The only detail is that you'd need to add elements from right to left to make sure that the last element is in the answer.

→ Reply

sfialok98

6 years ago, # ^ |

Got it.. Thanks..!!

→ Reply

haribhatt34

6 years ago, # |

-9

Is it just me? I got TLE in Problem E, this is my solution. https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48246073

After scratching my head for some minutes, I added

ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false);
cin.tie(NULL);

And voila, it passed.

→ Reply

arnavism

6 years ago, # ^ |

-10

i got TLE till the end. fml need to learn cpp now.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

sys.stdin.readline() instead of input() and using PyPy instead of Python speeds up this solution greatly.

→ Reply

_asmah98

6 years ago, # ^ |

You can apply fast IO in python too !

→ Reply

b506

6 years ago, # ^ |

-10

Yeah..What was that, i mean because of that i got 2 penalties.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

lets see what awoo replies to this

→ Reply

Magi

6 years ago, # |

+10

I brainfarted so hard this contest and i am really disappointed of myself... Solved A in 2 minutes then nothing... I didn't know how to solve B even though i think it's really easy (even tried to implement a DP solution) and i thought for one hour and a half that C was asking something else... RIP my rating

F for prayers

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

→ Reply

Magi

6 years ago, # ^ |

+12

I literally thought i had to print the number of characters i eliminated.

Kill me

→ Reply

ak_j17_258749

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

NO — SUFFEЯ

UPD: well, we all have blunders, which are especially humiliating if you slip while reading the task spe. I've just had the same experience with A (I misunderstood it two times, hence spent 15 minutes instead of 3 or maybe 5)... so yes, I am SUFFEЯing here with you, haha

→ Reply

Int2k

6 years ago, # ^ |

ohhh, so that's why, after trying so hard with the B and didn't know wtf is going on, you saved my day m8 :x

→ Reply

0101-1001

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

Does greedy with binary search work for F? I got a TLE on 23rd test.

→ Reply

JettyOller

6 years ago, # ^ |

Binary-search can't pass timelimit!

→ Reply

Evro

6 years ago, # ^ |

shuffle the array randomly first

→ Reply

0101-1001

6 years ago, # ^ |

Can you elaborate on which array to shuffle? We need to maintain contiguity in cities right?

→ Reply

Evro

6 years ago, # ^ |

+15

The Trucks Array should be shuffled randomly,and while doing binary search on each truck you should maintain the highest fuel size found,if this fuel size is good enough for the current truck, you shouldn't do binary search

shuffling just increase the chance of getting the highest fuel quickly.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # |

-14

awoo https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48242640 https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48241968 the only difference is fast input line i dont think thats how you decide the outcome of a question

→ Reply

akshat98

6 years ago, # ^ |

-9

https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48246817 https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48247813 Exact same code but TLE on one.

→ Reply

tantam75

6 years ago, # ^ |

-28

So this round should be unrated right?

→ Reply

lakshay_nasa

6 years ago, # |

what can be the test case 4 of problem C ?

→ Reply

I_am_Heisenberg

6 years ago, # ^ |

2 3

3 4

6 7

7 8

Ans — 1 1 2 2

→ Reply

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

Well, idk if I was tired or whatever, but B seemed really hard to me, maybe one of the hardest B's ever imo.

→ Reply

tantam75

6 years ago, # ^ |

Think of it simply and greedy, you will figure out that we should find first "[...:" and last ":...]" of the string which satisfy two ':' are different, then just choose all '|' between two ':'.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

I have AC, it just happened that I found it extremely hard.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 3 →

I had to spend more than an hour solving problem C. That is a very annoying type of problem. I finally solved problem C, but Spending too much time is the cause of trouble. I couldn't submit the Accepted code by a few seconds, so I couldn't solve problem E in the competition. :(

→ Reply

Too_lazy_to_solve

6 years ago, # ^ |

Same happened with me.Completely forgot to check dashboard while solving C ,otherwise i could have solved E

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

And within one minute after System Testing was finished, I submitted the correct code...

→ Reply

Too_lazy_to_solve

6 years ago, # ^ |

i know ,code was too short.There was nothing in this problem to put as problem E but still badluck !!

→ Reply

LeDuyAnh

6 years ago, # ^ |

can you explain me why my E got TLE at test 7 please :< https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48241159

→ Reply

haribhatt34

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

I had the same issue

Add these

ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false);
cin.tie(NULL);

→ Reply

LeDuyAnh

6 years ago, # ^ |

ohh..thank you so much ! i get AC now

→ Reply

haribhatt34

6 years ago, # |

How to solve C?

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

I solved it by finding the non intersecting segments in the union of all the given segments. After that just put the first segment in one of the group and all others in the second group.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

i did the same..but i cant understand why i got a wrong answer

→ Reply

alpha_killer

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 3 →

Check this Test.

2 3

3 4

6 7

7 8

Ans — 1 1 2 2

→ Reply

VLADO

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

Sort segments by L. Put segment 0 in group 1 (set t[0] = 1). Also, let r = R[0] (right border of segment 0). Now, for segments 1 to n-1: if L[i] <= r, we must put it in group 1 (t[i] = 1), also r = max(r, R[i]), as we are continuing the group. Otherwise (L[i] > r), put it and all others to its right into group 2.

Note: for simplicity's sake I wrote t[0], t[1] etc, but since you sort the segments this won't work. There is a simple workaround to this, though.

→ Reply

dorijanlendvaj

6 years ago, # |

Ugh, I saw that F was solved by almost no one so I only decided to read it 10 minutes before the end of the contest, realized that it was really easy and ACed it 5 minutes after contest... RIP rating

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

binary is tle

→ Reply

dorijanlendvaj

6 years ago, # ^ |

Well...

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Oh, nice. My bad.

→ Reply

dioji

6 years ago, # |

+20

That moment when E has more AC than C

→ Reply

6 years ago, # |

Can anyone help me understand what i did wrong for question c. what i basically did was a brute force approach,checked if a number(point) is occurring in other segments if not i am marking that index and then printing 2 for other segments and 1 for the marked index. my sol is here

→ Reply

AceIn

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

I think you misunderstood the problem.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

can you give me any test cases?? The test case for which my code went wrong is not being shown.

→ Reply

AceIn

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

The "segments" the problem is referring to contains all integers from l to r. For example, for this case:

2
1 3
2 4

The two segments intersect, therefore the answer should be -1.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Thought about the intersection part and understood my mistake!!!

→ Reply

AceIn

6 years ago, # ^ |

That's great. But also, you should not expect an O(n^2) solution to pass anyways.

→ Reply

https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48253797

6 years ago, # ^ |

Given the time limit and due to my misunderstanding i tried the O(n^2) approach.i mostly code on codechef and a 2 sec time limit generally implies a brute force will pass..

→ Reply

Vichitr

6 years ago, # ^ |

No. Never does so. It depends on constraints. If n < = 10³ then only it passes on codechef. If constraints are as big as 10⁵ on codechef then O(nlogn) solution may pass.

→ Reply

grenade_4

6 years ago, # |

A better version of problem E would be to find the number of bills inside the wallet for each query.

Solution: Click here

Time Complexiy: O(Nlog^2N)

Space Complexity: O(NlogN).

Any better solution?

→ Reply

arnavism

6 years ago, # ^ |

this got TLE

but it is O(n) i guess.....yeah its python it sucks will never use again i was new here

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Compile with PyPy, not Python

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Lol what an overkill for E. Nice

→ Reply

arnavism

6 years ago, # ^ |

can u please help me as why did i get a TLE???

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Complexity is good, just, python is slow in this one. Try to maybe find some function for optimizing input idk.

→ Reply

mouse_wireless

6 years ago, # ^ |

I tried to implement it like this but didn't manage to make it fit the time limit, even with all optimizations. It gets to test 24 (and it seems really close).

→ Reply

6 years ago, # |

How to solve D?

→ Reply

Len

6 years ago, # ^ |

For each prime p find vertices that p | a[i], and find max path in every component of graph consisting of vertices you found.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Can you please elaborate? After finding the vertices that divide a particular prime what do we do? What is the component that you are talking about?

→ Reply

Len

6 years ago, # ^ |

I mean if you only take the vertices from graph that can be divided by p, graph will get divided into some components, take max path from each component.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Alright I understand the logic thanks a lot!

Can you still explain how did you implement it? I mean how did you divide the graph into only the components with these vertices.

After getting the above I'll be able to solve it with DFS

→ Reply

hypomaniac

6 years ago, # ^ |

Will it fit in time limit?

→ Reply

Len

6 years ago, # ^ |

There can be only 7 unique primes that divide every number, so it's O(N).

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

I think so. The sum of all sizes of the graphs will be O(n log n), because each vertex has at most O(log n) prime divisors.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # |

Why are there so many problems for which the query is given?

→ Reply

FLEA

6 years ago, # |

C condition is very strenge,i have solved the problem where it is asked to divide the set of segments into two sets such that each set does not have overlaps

→ Reply

youssefbou62

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

Why does my submission for C fail in tc1 using g++ 11/17 48256069&& gets AC with clang 48258190 ?

Edit : I figured it out i wrote the fast io thing after doing the first cin

→ Reply

AryaKnight

6 years ago, # ^ |

Replace if(!j) by if(j).

→ Reply

Hitesh_0301

6 years ago, # |

Problem D Code Can someone please tell what's wrong in this code?

→ Reply

Tameshk

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

-7

Good contest!

→ Reply

_Zoroark_

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 3 →

In Problem C, I first Sort the interval according to x and then y. Then I traversed and check while(arr[i].y >= arr[j].x) j++. I put them into same set.Here is my implementation (Link) why it is giving WA??? can anyone give me by giving a useful test case.

→ Reply

zetapi

6 years ago, # ^ |

testcase : (1,9) (2,3) (4,5)

→ Reply

Vivek1998299

6 years ago, # |

What are the prerequisites to solve G? And please can anyone suggest relevant resources for the same?

→ Reply

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505293/how-many-subsets-xor-to-given-value

6 years ago, # ^ |

+22

Gaussian elimination on binary vectors. This kind of problem appeared many times before, even in educational rounds.

→ Reply

Vivek1998299

6 years ago, # ^ |

Thanx a lot!!

→ Reply

6 years ago, # |

+67

I don't see any issue with the amount of the input data in E. It is totally fine to remind you to use faster i/o operations once in a while. My solution works in 300ms and I set TL for 3s. That is so generous that you can even get AC in Python (if you know how to read data fast there).

There is no difference between getting TL because of slow i/o and because of unoptimal solution. And you shouldn't blame author for failing slow solutions.

→ Reply

xuanquang1999

6 years ago, # ^ |

Is there any reason for setting that problem as problem E though? There is a fastio trap, but that should not raise the problem difficulty that much.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

thanks for good contest .I was surprised to see problem e is easier than b and c.

→ Reply

SpartaCU

6 years ago, # |

+28

Cheaters Odin- , timo14z On all Problems : D

A: 48219687 , 48218791

B: 48223299 , 48224656

C: 48234891 , 48232754

D: 48239659 , 48241851

E: 48227416 , 48230879

I hope you look into it awoo.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 4 →

-6

they will probably be skipped wether you say it or not.

→ Reply

stefdasca

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

+21

it's a shame that a former contest writer is doing this

→ Reply

CopeCope

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

How to optimize this solution for F. I used randomization but I have TLE on test 23

→ Reply

padamprakash2014

6 years ago, # |

after doing E got the importance of
ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false);

cin.tie(NULL);

→ Reply

dioji

6 years ago, # |

What's going on with the hacks on E? Is the hack making the solution TLE because of the slow input?

→ Reply

Ildar_Yalalov

6 years ago, # |

+14

How to solve G

→ Reply

Michelin_star

6 years ago, # |

please help!!! why my code is showing TLE https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48260807

→ Reply

dioji

6 years ago, # ^ |

add these lines:

ios_base::sync_with_stdio(0); cin.tie(NULL);

→ Reply

SSRIs

6 years ago, # |

Do hacks give points??

→ Reply

neel71

6 years ago, # ^ |

Not in educational or Div3. But gaining top position in Hackers Table is prestigious.

→ Reply

di_z

6 years ago, # ^ |

Besides, if you make more hacks, you can get a higher ranking since others drop.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # |

I solved E faster than B.. :/

→ Reply

Hash

6 years ago, # ^ |

I solved D faster than C :)

→ Reply

SSRIs

6 years ago, # ^ |

+59

→ Reply

gurjeet8197

6 years ago, # ^ |

Can u please tell the logic to solve D?

→ Reply

https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48257605

6 years ago, # ^ |

Please refer this. :)

→ Reply

_Ash_

6 years ago, # |

How to solve C?

→ Reply

gurjeet8197

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

Sort all the queries wrt left limit li. Then traverse keeping track of the max of right limit ri, let us assume rmax. If u ever get l(i+1) > rmax at ith iteration, u can divide it into two groups.

→ Reply

ParagonX97

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

Hi everyone! Could someone help me? I tried to solve problem C, but it gives me TLE and my computer runs the first test case in 31 ms. :( This is my submission.

→ Reply

Bedge

6 years ago, # ^ |

As there are many test case, try to clean vectors only if they are less than or equal n, not maxn.

→ Reply

djm03178

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

+45

Here's a spoiler for my 60 hacks on E: As already mentioned above, the amount of input is quite large. Though some solutions using endl or alternating cin and cout still passed, reaching ALMOST 3s.

There was also a test where 499999 queries are '?' queries so it was an 'almost-worst case' for such solutions. But it wasn't 'THE worst' case.

I made a generator where the first query is + 1000000000 1000000000 and the rest 499999 queries are ? 1000000000 1000000000. This input not only consists maximum number of characters possible, but also requires maximum number of characters in the output. Then I just went through every AC submissions with time > 2900ms and it worked for all of the 'slow-I/O' codes.

→ Reply

Abh1Kudo

6 years ago, # ^ |

isnt the hack file too large to be submitted as testcase?

→ Reply

stefdasca

6 years ago, # ^ |

One can generate the input by writing a generator code.

→ Reply

ale

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

Little overkill I made on problem D .. :) I used Centroid Decomposition!!

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Me too. xd

→ Reply

l-_-l

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

+24

Im GENIUS!!! Im hacked all people, who solved problem B on PascalABC... INCLUDE ME..IM SUPER GENIUS...!!

→ Reply

ovidiu.intellectual

6 years ago, # |

haha so glad i skipped this one see the people getting hacked off:))))))))))))))=)))))))))

→ Reply

nikit523

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

Cheaters (Hacks) Mohammad.H915, NeverSee On problem A:

48264141 48264121 and many others

I hope you look into it awoo.

→ Reply

ovidiu.intellectual

6 years ago, # ^ |

lol

→ Reply

265918

6 years ago, # ^ |

If they weren't skipped then I would be surprised

→ Reply

MuhammedAbdalla

6 years ago, # |

How to solve problem D

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 3 →

for all prime numbers less or equal to n find the graph g that all vertices of it are dividable by n (it may not be connected) and find the longest path on it and then the maximum of these values is the answer. this is of course O(n*logn).

→ Reply

parth_15

6 years ago, # ^ |

How is complexity O(nlogn)?

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 6 →

because there is at most logn prime factor in n .

→ Reply

parth_15

6 years ago, # ^ |

There is not logn prime between 1 to n. It is more.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 5 →

ّI meant there is at most log n prime factor in n you see each vertex at most logn time so it should be o(nlogn)

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

+14

In fact, there's less than logN primes for a number <= N (we aren't talking about primes <= N but primes that divide a certain number <= N). It's the inverse of primorial function https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primorial

→ Reply

linkRs

6 years ago, # ^ |

I can't figure out why just pick up prime numbers, can you explain me please?

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 4 →

suppose we have the answer it should be a path with gcd more than 1 so all the vertices in the path are dividable by a number(the gcd)though that number is also dividable by some prime numbers. thus all of the vertices are dividable by some prime numbers so picking all prime numbers we can obtain the longest path.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 7 →

+19

You can solve it using modified dfs.
How?
Let us iterate i from 2 to sqrt(200000),
For each i, lets perform dfs:
  We try to reach as much depth as possible which is divisible by i, from the current root (let's say j);
  Let the top 2 maximum depths reached (using 'j' as root) be f and s;
  Thus the longest path can possibly be f+s+1 ( starting from one depth, turning at the root and ending in the other depth).
  So we take the maximum out of all of the above mentioned paths for all roots, for all i.

Also we need to once run the same dfs given above for each i = a[j]; (where a is given value array and 'j' is the current root).
This will cover the case in which every number is a prime.
Thus, the final maximum of length of all the paths will give us the answer.
Complexity: O(n*sqrt(n))
Check my submission for more clarity.
UPD: Thaid Thanks for the hack. Was able to find out the error in my method :). Its updated now .

→ Reply

Thaid

6 years ago, # ^ |

+15

Consider this test:

3
1 7207 7207
1 2
1 3

I'm sorry for a hack

→ Reply

Robbinb1993

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 6 →

It can be done in O(N log N + complexity of prime factorizations) if we consider all prime factors among prime factorizations of values of all vertices. We will create a mapping prime factor -> list of vertices that contain this factor in the prime factorization of their value. Now we iterate over the map and for each prime factor we enable these vertices. Next we iterate over these vertices one more time and if the vertex has not been marked as seen for the current prime before we find the diameter in the tree of currently enabled vertices, rooted at this vertex. The answer is the maximum diameter of a tree we have found in the end. As each vertex only has a maximum of log N prime factors in its factorization, each node is only visited a maximum of log N times.

→ Reply

agtxdy_orz

6 years ago, # ^ |

Your method is correct but instead of map if you simply store vertices in an array of vector, you will get rid of "heavy constant of map".

→ Reply

Robbinb1993

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 4 →

Yes you are right, array of size 200000 should be used instead of STL map, otherwise the complexity will be O(N log^2 N) to build the map: https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48282989. Prime factorization still requires O(N log^2 N) complexity, thus the overall complexity is O(N log^2 N).

→ Reply

SI_AM

6 years ago, # |

+20

Codeforces should reduce the time for hacking phase.

→ Reply

Ghost0fSparta

6 years ago, # |

MarcosK is on fire!!! Hacking people like anything!

→ Reply

MarcosK

6 years ago, # ^ |

+19

Curious fact: I made 219 hacks with just 2 testcases :P

→ Reply

mTvTm

6 years ago, # ^ |

"[]" is one of them right?

→ Reply

Attendre

6 years ago, # ^ |

whats the case?

→ Reply

SIUUUUUUU

6 years ago, # ^ |

:[]: and [::]

→ Reply

eidan

6 years ago, # |

Anyone else solved G greedily and has absolutely no clue why it works?

→ Reply

6 years ago, # |

Why there are a lot of hacking in problem A and B?

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

For, B: Weak pretests, I think.
I did a very silly (wrong) assumption that the characters [, ], : and | are always present in the given string. (I didn't notice this part (1≤|s| ). And unfortunately, all the pretests had all these [, ], : and | characters. There was not a single pretest with |s| < 4.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Thank you.

→ Reply

adhoc_king

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

For A: some people submitted a brute force O(n) complexity algorithm and got TLE. Instead O(1) solution was possible

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

OK. Thank you.

→ Reply

nikesh04

6 years ago, # |

Is it possible to solve problem D by rooting the tree at 1?

I am actually clueless. I am wondering if it is possible or not?

→ Reply

Sanazmgh

6 years ago, # ^ |

it is ... I mean I did that and it got accepted and another clue : think about the prime numbers :)

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Usually, for trees problems, if not having any specific requirements, rooting from any vertices will always result in one desired value if your ideas/implementation is correct ;)

→ Reply

nikesh04

6 years ago, # ^ |

Can you describe something more for "any specific requirements".

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

That one is just a criterion given in statements.

Like, if the tree is stated to be rooted at 1, and has clear descriptions of its nodes' ascendant-descendant relationship, you have to choose 1 as the root regardless. Otherwise, choosing any vertices as the root doesn't matter.

→ Reply

nikesh04

6 years ago, # ^ |

I meant by asking that under which condition I cannot root my tree to any specific node if not specified in the question.

→ Reply

TLE Solution without random ordering

6 years ago, # ^ |

AFAIK, if the problem statements do not give any details about the specified node to be rooted, you can freely choose your root to start traversing.
At least that applies to all DFS/BFS-based traverse.

→ Reply

AZ01

6 years ago, # |

+36

SomeOne, please update Ratings.

→ Reply

Hanani

6 years ago, # ^ |

+55

Someone is sleeping

→ Reply

nantf

6 years ago, # |

So when can the editorial be released?(And also rating changes?)

→ Reply

nifengfly

6 years ago, # |

+11

Why can't rating changes be updated automatically?

→ Reply

pranshugarg02

6 years ago, # |

Why my same solution of B is being accepted now, when it was hacked earlier??

→ Reply

pranshugarg02

6 years ago, # ^ |

Please someone clarify this

→ Reply

nifengfly

6 years ago, # ^ |

The test case is still old. System test has not yet begun.

→ Reply

joylintp

6 years ago, # |

Will there be another system test later or it's already finished?

→ Reply

jaizzB

6 years ago, # ^ |

There will be !! Everyone is eager for it to begin! Wish U a high rating!

→ Reply

joylintp

6 years ago, # ^ |

Thanks a lot! Wish you a high rating, too!

→ Reply

ShowStopper728

6 years ago, # ^ |

it says final standings .

I think the system testing is already finished .

→ Reply

jaizzB

6 years ago, # ^ |

Not yet, It does say Final standing but system test yet to start. Most of the People waiting for it to start. Good Luck and High rating!!

→ Reply

ShowStopper728

6 years ago, # ^ |

it always says Final Standings when the system testing is finished

→ Reply

Michelin_star

6 years ago, # |

how to slove problem C?

→ Reply

ShowStopper728

6 years ago, # ^ |

sort the segments by L

iterate over the segments and store the max R . when you find a segment which has L bigger than the current maximum R put it in the other group with all the remaining segments.

→ Reply

radu_msk

6 years ago, # |

Where is the rating?

→ Reply

De.Wilde

6 years ago, # |

Got Problem F Accepted with a small randomization trick + Binary Search.

First of all, I assumed the direct Binary Search would not pass the worst case.

What if we can binary search on each truck and find it's minimum required volume and use that result as low of next truck? Also, I did a check before running the binary search if the previous result can already satisfy the current truck.

A little improvement but now the question arises, would it still pass on some specific type of ordering of the dataset? Surely not and it didn't.

So, I reordered the input order of trucks randomly and ran the same solution which got accepted with pretty fast runtime.

Accepted Solution with random ordering

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

That's this trick https://codeforces.net/blog/entry/62602 . The complexity is O(N * M + N * logM * logANSWER)

→ Reply

De.Wilde

6 years ago, # ^ |

Thanks for that. It's explained nicely there :D

→ Reply

abhishalya

6 years ago, # |

-9

Not using fastio in E causes TLE. I think it should be mentioned in the problem statement to use fastio.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

+43

No, it shouldn't.

→ Reply

Adoki

6 years ago, # ^ |

What should have already happened is system testing. How long more we'll be waiting?

→ Reply

swetanjal

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 3 →

I thought that the TLE verdict is used to imply that your solution does not adhere to the intended time complexity. It doesn't make any sense if the solution adheres to the intended time complexity but still gets TLE because of just fast IO. After all these are algorithmic contests.

Anyways a learning to always use fast IO on CF! :)

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

+77

I would be very excited to see competitive programming problems and contests that test only the correctness and complexity of your solution. But, unfortunately, in reality things are just not like that. There are lots of problems where constant optimizations — fast i/o, bit hacks, replacing % with some subtractions/additions in modular arithmetics — really matter. If we don't cover this in our rounds, then participants would not be prepared to use these optimizations on some real contests.

The reason why we don't mention the requirements on fast i/o in the statements is the same: they are rarely mentioned on official competitions, so participants should be able to determine whether they need to use constant optimizations or not by themselves.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

doesnt that defeat the purpose of educationals vs regular rounds

i mean these are for 'The goal is rather to practice and to educate, than to compete'(as said by MikeMirzayanov), also these are oriented towards second division and newer coders,

so i think mentioning it in the question would me more motivating for the newer folk rather than them finding out that they had been doing the correct thing from the beginning but just got TLE bcoz of some damned fastio

btw thanks for replying rationally rather than just some arrogant, "No, it shouldn't."

→ Reply

caojiangxia

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

The education contest was originally designed to make the coder more adapt the regular contest. so through this contest, I think you will definitely pay attention to it later.

→ Reply

HereToDisappoint

6 years ago, # ^ |

Well, may I ask why ? In a comment above, you've mentioned "It is totally fine to remind you to use faster i/o operations once in a while". Surely mentioning it in the problem statement is another way to remind ?

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

-11

well if using fastio can change the verdict of the exact same code then i think it is necessary to mention that

because fastio is not a differentiating factor when comparing a person who has the right algo, right code, right implementation... with someone with neither of these

→ Reply

adedalic

6 years ago, # ^ |

+16

"...fastio is not a differentiating factor...".

I disagree with such proposition. Usually, fastIO is a mistake of newcomers. That's why, it shows your experience in the same way as knowing standart library, math, data structures and other.

I can replace "fastIO" with "random bug" in your statement and it will sound the same. And that's because solving the problem is not just having idea, but a complex task, and if you fail at least in one part, you will look the same as "someone with neither of these".

And final thought, if you've got TLE because of slowIO, it means that your implementation is not right. And you can only blame yourself.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

imagine this case you are new to programming, you give this question a try, you get the logic and are able to write the code correctly now you submit it and get TLE, you are confused and think that maybe there is some problem with logic and u think and think but couldnt find aany, you get very frustrated and after the contest you realise that a simple fastio line could have gotten you AC you were right all along from the beginning

how would you feel, would you be excited that you learned about fastio or angry about some fastio ruining your verdict, would this incident be motivating for you to pursue coding further

what i suggest something like "fastio recommended" in the question of "educational round" and this new programmer learns about it and as well implements it in the first time and gets his code accepted, wont this be more motivating for him

→ Reply

adedalic

6 years ago, # ^ |

+26

Frustrating is common feeling, everyone in this community felt it many times, and, if newcomer can't deal with it, then it's his personal problem (moreover, frustrating is caused by his own mistakes).

What he has to do is to get valuable information from it and preform better in the future.

Ah, and adding "fastio recommended" is bad idea, since almost nobody will learn the lesson. Instead, more people will complain in the future, when they will have to use their own heads.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

+38

Meh, learning doesn't work that way. I believe, learning from your mistakes is the most efficient method of learning.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

ya, agreed but this is like purposely digging a ditch for someone to fall so that they be careful the next time

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 3 →

+20

Do you think that 500000 queries were just to mess with slow i/o lovers? It was done to guarantee that none of heavily optimized q² solutions will pass. You can scroll past the previous rounds to see that people were getting n² AC for n = 10⁵ and some crazy things like that. These low-level compiler optimizations are still black magic to me, so I better ensure it is impossible.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

The input has a clear 3 constant, you should be able to recognize this if you're using a slow read method such as cin/cout. Otherwise just go for the printf/scanf. The large input is a consequence of the required constraints of the problem

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

imagine this case you are new to programming, you give this question a try, you get the logic and are able to write the code correctly now you submit it and get tle, you are confused and think that maybe there is some problem with logic and u think and think but couldnt find aany, you get very frustated and after the contest you realise that a simple fastio line could have gotten you AC you were right all along from the beginning

how would you feel, would you be excited that you learned about fastio or angry about some fastio ruining your verdict, would this incident be motivating for you to pursue coding further

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Seems like a good oportunity to get educated enough about fast io to the point where it's unlikely you'll ever forget again

The suggestion is okay, it's even present from time to time, but it's way different to say suggestion and, textually, "digging a ditch for someone to fall". No, it isn't wrong or required, you're just triggered.

→ Reply

Bch

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

Maybe is shouldn't but it does. Check it out https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48266295 https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48234518 2978 ms and 327. Of course second solution got hacked.

→ Reply

WWWTTTFFF

6 years ago, # |

when will the rating changes come out?

→ Reply

rsan

6 years ago, # |

include

include <math.h>

using namespace std; typedef long long ll; int main() { int n,i; cin>>n; int maxx=0,maxy=0; for(i=0;i<n;i++) { char c; cin>>c; //cout<<c<<endl; if(c=='+') { int x,y; cin>>x>>y; if(max(x,y)> max(maxx,maxy)) maxx=max(x,y); if(min(x,y)> min(maxx,maxy)) maxy=min(x,y); } if(c=='?') { int h,w; cin>>h>>w; if((h>=maxx&&w>=maxy)||(h>=maxy&&w>=maxx)) cout<<"YES"<<endl; else cout<<"NO"<<endl; } } return 0; }

This is the code of question E, but TLE at test case 7, can anyone explain why TLE is coming?

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 3 →

just add this line before taking input in main()

std::ios::sync_with_stdio(false),cin.tie(0),cout.tie(0);

→ Reply

Mohammad_Yasser

6 years ago, # |

+36

So I've a miraculous solution for G, which I've no idea how it passed. First, I've misread segments into sets, so I thought the elements order does not matter. Second, I couldn't come up with a solution for that version too, but hey, the contest end is so close, so what do we try to do in these cases? Just try out anything without caring a bit about correctness, i.e. think of some greedy/randomized algorithm. I coded a randomized solution, and to my surprise, it passed!

After the contest while discussing the idea with a friend who maybe thought I'm sort of alien to think of a solution like this, I only thought he was surprised due to the randomized solution, but then I was shocked when he asked me, how even the answer for dividing into contiguous segments is the same as the answer for dividing into sets?

I'm still shocked since then, can anyone help me why is this submission AC?! At least is really the answer for dividing into subarrays the same as dividing into segments? Are they not necessarily but most probably the same? And even so, why is randomized solution getting the correct answer with high probability? To be even more shocking, in the randomized solution I just assumed that the difference between the sizes of the largest and smallest piles is at most 1 xD

Anyway, here's a conclusion: never give up on any problem till the last 20 minutes, for that random stupidness can turn out to be equivalent to ultimate intelligence.

→ Reply

lessmeaning

6 years ago, # ^ |

never give up on any problem till the last 10 minutes)))
original (I think) solution of problem G is just coding gauss algorithm in 2-6 minutes
so keep thinking and generating ideas such as another interpretation of problem at any time of the contest

→ Reply

alireza_kaviani

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

+11

500 tests for problem B

→ Reply

Nuwaisir_Rabi

6 years ago, # ^ |

Its more than 500. At least 562... :O

→ Reply

adhoc_king

6 years ago, # ^ |

576 :o

→ Reply

praeda_est_supra

6 years ago, # ^ |

+12

588

→ Reply

ovidiu.intellectual

6 years ago, # ^ |

1 ;oo

→ Reply

codewiz

6 years ago, # ^ |

Greater than or equal to 588!! Almost 600

→ Reply

dipta10

6 years ago, # |

Can anyone tell me when will the rating be add to my profile? The contest and open hacking have ended, yet the rating has not been added in my profile.

→ Reply

codewiz

6 years ago, # ^ |

This is because final rating is calculated after system testing... and after that it is added to your profile. So wait for system testing to end. After that it won't take much time

→ Reply

__naruto__

6 years ago, # |

+21

When tester got no chill! :p

→ Reply

sup_bro

6 years ago, # |

+16

Longest system testing I've ever seen. 600 tests in B lol.

→ Reply

Decayed

6 years ago, # |

Why can't I see all of my submitted codes on My Submission tab

→ Reply

ak_j17_258749

6 years ago, # ^ |

the UI seems to fall apart during the systests phase... d'ooooooh, SUCH SUSPENSE VERY TENSE

→ Reply

coderforlife

6 years ago, # |

Question B has highest number of hacks I have seen till date. Thus it also has 600 test cases XD

→ Reply

radu_msk

6 years ago, # |

I got TLE on C because i didn't use Fast IO :(( These tests are not ok!

→ Reply

coderforlife

6 years ago, # ^ |

Same bro. I feel your pain! The bigger problem is when you don't know what to do after that TLE :<

→ Reply

6 years ago, # |

What is hack for B?

I can't understand why some greedy solutions get WA. All solutions a kind of let's find the first "[" and the first ": ". Afterwards let's find the last "]" and the last ": " before the last "]". And finally let's calculate number of "|" between ": ". The answer is the number of "|" + 4

→ Reply

Ghost0fSparta

6 years ago, # ^ |

I got it accepted with that logic. Maybe the hacks includes cases where you don't have a "[" or "]" at all in your string.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

Some of them check it.

example

→ Reply

Ghost0fSparta

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

Well implementation mistakes are always a headache when you have your logic correct...

→ Reply

swetanjal

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 4 →

:][:
Expected Output : -1
A lot of codes output 4.

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

But exactly this code outputs - 1

→ Reply

Jhin

6 years ago, # ^ |

Initial value of a=-1 and b=0 and his condition is if a<b but that's true when we don't have [ for example ::] that would output 4

→ Reply

6 years ago, # ^ |

← Rev. 2 →

Yes, you're right, I get it.

Thank you very much!

→ Reply

Reiva5

6 years ago, # |

So sad, the magic already gone :(. I missed my chance to hack "Legendary Grandmaster" :((

→ Reply

https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48296920

6 years ago, # |

+62

I don't know how bad luck this is.

→ Reply

toxicYLS

6 years ago, # |

Post the editorial please.

→ Reply

Muhammad98

6 years ago, # |

The round of hacks and test cases!

→ Reply

Mn619

6 years ago, # |

With one pass solution, small (500000) constraint and 3 Sec TL why this -https://codeforces.net/contest/1101/submission/48293304) gets TLE without using Fastio.

→ Reply

RedNextCentury

6 years ago, # ^ |

500000 lines with 1 char and 2 integers each is not small at all, and the output is large too.

→ Reply

RDDCCD

6 years ago, # |

Why this greedy solution for problem G is correct ?This one

→ Reply

devalfa

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

Hey anyone, can you help me with D? I used a DFS call from current node and the trailing recursion and passed them separate visited arrays, can't get the prime number solution some people are suggesting, any elaborations please? :'(

Here is my code

→ Reply

pepelats

6 years ago, # |

← Rev. 2 →

Can somebody find mistake in my code in problem D, please?

Or can you tell me what is the test 4 in this problem?

→ Reply

6 years ago, # |

Auto comment: topic has been updated by awoo (previous revision, new revision, compare).

→ Reply

6 years ago, # |

Auto comment: topic has been updated by awoo (previous revision, new revision, compare).

→ Reply

amiratou

6 years ago, # |

Can someone please explain to me why I got TLE in this submission and when I submitted the same code but after replacing the array of long long "ll ans[200005];" with the array of int "int ans[200005];" in this submission I got Accepted ? It happened to me during the contest and I got hacked on my submission with long long because it got TLE!

→ Reply