→ Pay attention
→ Top rated
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3856 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3747 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3706 |
| 4 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
| 5 | ksun48 | 3591 |
| 6 | gamegame | 3477 |
| 7 | Benq | 3468 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3462 |
| 9 | ecnerwala | 3451 |
| 10 | heuristica | 3431 |
→ Top contributors
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
| 3 | Dominater069 | 160 |
| 4 | Um_nik | 158 |
| 5 | atcoder_official | 157 |
| 6 | Qingyu | 156 |
| 7 | djm03178 | 151 |
| 7 | adamant | 151 |
| 9 | luogu_official | 150 |
| 10 | awoo | 147 |
→ Find user
→ Recent actions
Codeforces (c) Copyright 2010-2025 Mike Mirzayanov
The only programming contests Web 2.0 platform
Server time: Feb/23/2025 00:36:00 (f1).
Desktop version, switch to mobile version.
Supported by
Say you've found places for the first $$$i$$$ knights and are looking for spots for the $$$i + 1$$$-th knight. How many of the previous knights do you actually care about in terms of where the $$$i + 1$$$-th knight can go?
The dimensions:
dp[rows][3][5][5][7]If you think you know what to do, good luck, and I recommend recursion. Create the states in a way that will make it convenient to "shift" each knight when you place another one.
Thank you galen_colin! I tried to implement the idea again with the optimization you mentioned but unfortunately I got
TLE!Here is my implementation including both top-down and bottom-up approaches
I appreciate your help.