C1-C2 (div2) The shittiest problem of the November 2020 on CF
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 150 |
C1-C2 (div2) The shittiest problem of the November 2020 on CF
Name |
---|
agree
Such problems may lead a good coder to think (for a few hours) whether he/she really is a good coder.
Long implementation problems hurts a lot to brains.
Felt like solving Codechef long challenge problems.
Agree. I think, almost everyone was solving it the whole contest and didn't have time to even think about solution of D and E
please downvote him
C1-C2 (div2) The shittiest problem of
the November2020 on CFC1-C2 (div2) The shittiest problem on CF
C1-C2 (div2) The shittiest problem to come out of polygon
C1-C2 (div2) The shittiest problem
C1-C2 (div2)
C1-C2
C1
C
C'est la vie
-(C)
C1 and C2
C(1-2)
C(-3)
-3C
no there was one long which had more shitter problem than this. It was about calenders and which day of the week the given day was.
C1-C2 (problem) The shittiest div2 on CF
C1-C2(Div2) The shittest problem in the history of CF.
Sometimes I feel amazed to see that so many Div1 participants solved C1/C2 in just 10 minutes
That's why they are in div1
This problem is strong contender for most bullshit problem of the year. I have a strong feeling antontrygubO_o would have never allowed that.
+1 to you, but I can't fully agree with it. Still think that problem Div1B is shitty enough to compete with Div1A.
I could not vote for 1B because i wasted complete 2 hrs fixing the bug in 1A and in the end found it was one ! which shouldn't be there. I decided that i will upsolve 1B but that i have changed mood after seeing your comment.
Was it the shittiest because you couldn't solve it?!
Of course not. I solved C1, C2 — not. So, not solving a problem — it's not the parametr of the shittiest problem...
So what's the reason? (Cause I found them interesting)
How the hell can you find a 200+ lines implementation problem with nothing to learn from it, with 20+ if-else/s and dozens of corner cases interesting. Just because you are from the same country as the authors ? Even you couldn't solve C2. Just wasting 2 hours straight on a case-handling problem in no way interests anyone
Hmmm... so how do you explain this? It's less than 35 lines.
Because it's a C1 solution?
Check this out. It's not even 100 lines :|
The point isn't if it CAN be implemented in fewer lines, it's if the approach people are generally going to go with is even feasible for the difficulty or not. The target for this question was to add a distinction in skill between say a pupil and a specialist /expert(or something similar), if an overwhelming majority of these people are only able to solve it using 200+ lines of code then the fact that it can be implemented in much less is irrelevant.
No, the point is that your overly whining because you haven't had enough practice in another what I believe is a significant part of cp, being able to implement efficiently and nicely.
Here's my code that was how I did it naturally my first time. Not saying it's great, or that the problem was that exciting, but it's not close to 200+ lines, and I knew it was bound for people to be overly rated without being well rounded in all skills cp.
Did you even read my comment? I never said anything about it being a good or bad problem (even tho i hated it), it was about how bringing up randomn submissions with fewer lines doesn't change the fact that for most people in the skill group, that was implementation hell, your code has a lot of copy paste in it too, and while I'm sure implement is an important skill, you fail to understand that for the people that the question was for(pupil to expert or similar), it was JUST TOO HARD to implement because of the things mentioned above. I'm sure I and a lot other people are shit at a lot of skills essential for cp but out of all those things that we fail to do in contests this is the one on which (relative)outrage is happening, why? I don't think it's as simple as GIT GUD.
Did you even read my comment?
Did you even read my comment? I said it was because people in your skill group aren't being exposed to enough implementation recently, which is supposed to be an easier skill in cp, not too hard, and that is why there is much more outrage. Also this is all I pretty much ever copy paste:
Besides the template which is shorter than yours, the cp people I talk to will all say I don't copy paste, I just practice implementing short...
amarnathsama What do you even mean? Isn't implementation a necessary skill in CP ?
Yes, it is, among others.
I don't think that is the reason because i also didn't solve D,E,F.
my solution of C1 was nearly 800 lines -_- -_-
Not sure if you realize that, but that tells worse about you rather than about problem :P
I didnt even read D :( , thank you d2-c2
Then there exist people like me who realized C1 was worth less points than B after solving it
I guess problem setters prioritize brute force less.
and i am still debugging my solution to C2. WA on testcase 2, test 48 (:
Let me know as well, if you get that testcase 48. I dont know how to check that.
1 2 3 111 110
I guess your solution fails test with just 3*3 square where all symbols are equal to 1
I have the same wa on pretest two and the case is I think a 3*2 or 2*3 grid because my code prints the answer as 7 where the limit is [0,6] for the total moves
No, its this test case. This returns 7 moves for my code. I solve the left 2x2 grid and then right 2x2 grid
If you Will fix 2*2 aquare, where number of 1 is less (or equal) then in another, firstly, and another 2*2 square after this, it Will be not more than 6 moves always.
It is a trick that helps avoid this case, in generally yours implementation correct
mine 48 too..and i know my solution are exceeding n*m in most of odd n * odd m containing all '1' cases
Not agree. I have another sentence that will be downvoted, but is true: "think two times, so you won't have to code three times".
preach
imagine being lgm and thinking you're gonna get downvoted
Its a relative terminology they often use. Had he commented "Hi" he would get 500 upvotes at least.
Maybe I would agree with you if you had some clever solution that wasn't painful to code.
But no, I opened it and it is 174 lines (after I deleted the template!), full of copy-paste and +1 -1 in lines like
zrob({i, j}, {i+1, j}, {i+1, j+1});
. Anyone trying to code like this that isn't 90% as good at implementation as you would have made at least 20 mistakes.A neater implementation to problem Ca
What's wrong with that one? Seems that it is yet another ad-hoc regular CF problems that we have in all rounds. I wonder then, why authors though that A2 is 500 only. If that were 500-1000, I would say pretty good one, or just kill A1 and do A2 as B 1250 (implementation with lots of potential bugs) and create a good 500 A.
On the other hand, B was complete shit though.
Link for posteriority https://codeforces.net/contest/1440/problem/C1
looks like many people felt that way but isn't quick implementation an essential skill to have? or am i missing something here?
But I see its upvoted.
So it is false?
Be confident guy, delete "the November 2020 on" and it'll be "C1-C2 (div2) The shittiest problem of CF". That makes sense, doesn't it?
A problem such as this is, as any other, a learning opportunity. In this case, an opportunity to learn how to think of the least painful implementation, before starting to code. And, importantly, when to stop thinking and go back to coding.
There are different genres of contest problems. For example, if we group by the general question, there are "how to do it at all?", "how to do it efficiently?", and then there is "sure it can be done, but how to code it, reliably, so that it will work in the end?". Personally, I find the latter genre somewhat appealing as well as others, and generally applicable outside of algorithmic problem solving.
The butthurt it causes, like this original post, can be seen as an added perk by some authors. Still, a contestant willing and able to learn could turn the pain into a learning experience.
Yes, I think the main trouble is about these problems weren't used for ACM-style contest, where they would be very appropriate. Instead of this, the problems were used for CF round and the main portion of negative feedback should be mostly addressed to the CF coordinators, who must have a good understanding of how the tasks are suitable for the CF round. If I saw problems Div1A, Div1B, Div1C in ACM-style contest, I would not say anything wrong about them.
Downvote me!!! ORZ!!!
[Deleted]
If guys dont mind, I have some implementations with comments here
$$$\text{Average case} = \frac{\text{Total count}}{\text{Rows}\ \cdot \text{Columns}\ \cdot \text{Total case}}$$$
For $$$N$$$ ones in table, it need exact $$$3 \times N$$$ operations
For every $$$N \cdot M$$$ table, it need averagely $$$\frac{3N}{2}$$$ operations
$$$\text{Average case} = \frac{\text{Total count}}{\text{Rows}\ \cdot \text{Columns}\ \cdot \text{Total case}}$$$
For $$$S$$$ ones in table, it need maximumly $$$min(N \cdot M, 3 \times S)$$$ operations
For every $$$N \cdot M$$$ table, it need averagely $$$\frac{N}{2}$$$ operations and maximumly $$$N * M$$$ operations
$$$\text{Average case} = \frac{\text{Total count}}{\text{Rows}\ \cdot \text{Columns}\ \cdot \text{Total case}}$$$
For every $$$N \cdot M$$$ table, it need averagely $$$\frac{N}{2}$$$ operations and maximumly $$$min(N \cdot M, \lceil \frac{n + 1}{2} \rceil + \lceil \frac{m(n - 2)}{2} \rceil + (m - 2) + 3)$$$ operations
I mean, I agree it is quite coding-heavy, but I would not agree that problem was super shitty or whatever. Idea behind the problem is not that bad. I would think that if it was on some ICPC contest nobody would bat an eye, but this positioning here was something that caused so much outrage since it is not pleasant for problem you start with (in Div1) and problem that should be fairly simple to Div2 people as well (cause they will drown in badly written code more than Div1 people).
I agree!!
Please, don't write such comments on 4 month old threads, unless you actually have something new and valuable to add. If your comment is "this problem is shit" (in this case, provide arguments) or "I agree" (in this case, just upvote) then there is no need to write it at all. It's just polluting Recent Actions.
You're actually getting up-votes bro...(I think you're right.)