| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3993 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3743 |
| 3 | orzdevinwang | 3707 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3627 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | Benq | 3564 |
| 7 | Kevin114514 | 3443 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3434 |
| 9 | Rewinding | 3397 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 156 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 9 | nor | 153 |
Weak test case for problem 1771C (Problem no C of last round)
I wasn't happy with the time complexity of my solution. So, I was looking for a solution with improved time complexity. And I found this. This guy solved this problem by only checking the first 200 elements after each index and comparing GCD of each pair . He won with the power of probability!
His submission: 184781213
Test Case result should be Yes. His solution prints No
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en1 |
|
AshrafSustS19 | 2022-12-12 07:10:08 | 1416 | Initial revision (published) |
