| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3839 |
| 3 | Radewoosh | 3646 |
| 4 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 4 | Benq | 3620 |
| 6 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
| 7 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 7 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 9 | ecnerwala | 3494 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Um_nik | 164 |
| 2 | maomao90 | 160 |
| 3 | -is-this-fft- | 159 |
| 4 | atcoder_official | 158 |
| 4 | cry | 158 |
| 4 | awoo | 158 |
| 7 | adamant | 155 |
| 8 | nor | 154 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 153 |
| 10 | maroonrk | 152 |
Python weird memory limit exceeded
This is the problem
This is my solution
I think my solution matches some of the answers given by some grandmasters. However I am not able to figure out the reasons for getting MLE. I have only 3 lists of length 200000 each and I am sure this is not the reason for MLE.
If anyone can guide me it would be nice.
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en3 |
|
dsanurag520 | 2024-04-29 16:18:18 | 40 | Tiny change: 'r MLE.\n\n' -> 'r MLE.\n\nIf anyone can guide me it would be nice.' | |
| en2 |
|
dsanurag520 | 2024-04-29 16:17:03 | 20 | ||
| en1 |
|
dsanurag520 | 2024-04-29 16:16:31 | 434 | Initial revision (published) |
