I have a set as
set<int> s;
I used lower_bound(s.begin(),s.end(),x)
It gave me TLE.
Thn i used s.lower_bound(x)
My solution passed.
Whats the difference in both? I mean why is it happening?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3803 |
2 | jiangly | 3707 |
3 | Benq | 3627 |
4 | ecnerwala | 3584 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3573 |
6 | Geothermal | 3569 |
6 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
8 | Radewoosh | 3542 |
9 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | awoo | 163 |
2 | maomao90 | 160 |
3 | adamant | 159 |
4 | maroonrk | 152 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 150 |
6 | atcoder_official | 148 |
6 | SecondThread | 148 |
8 | nor | 147 |
9 | TheScrasse | 146 |
10 | Petr | 144 |
Difference in these two ways of using lower_bound [C++]
I have a set as
set<int> s;
I used lower_bound(s.begin(),s.end(),x)
It gave me TLE.
Thn i used s.lower_bound(x)
My solution passed.
Whats the difference in both? I mean why is it happening?
Name |
---|