Hi guys!↵
↵
First of all, sorry for my poor english and short translation:)↵
↵
↵
Now everyone could access rating [formulas](http://codeforces.net/blog/entry/20762), and there is some not obvious mathematic formulas. So, I decided to check probability formula(probability that the i-th participant has better result than the j-th participant). :↵
↵
↵
↵
There was a lot of rating codeforces rounds, so it's easy to calculate this value by existing results. I choose cf rounds №200 — №350 (separately for each division). To solve this problem I wrote java program ([sources](https://github.com/WslF/CF_win_probability)). After getting results I copy/paste it to Excel and get plots:↵
↵
for first division↵
↵
↵
↵
for second division↵
↵
↵
↵
↵
Looks good, but lets try found something better:)↵
↵
↵
↵
Unfortunately this formula doesn't look scientific, so I a little bit change it:↵
↵
↵
↵
Now, lets build plots again↵
↵
for first division↵
↵
↵
↵
for second division↵
↵
↵
↵
Now it's closer:)
↵
First of all, sorry for my poor english and short translation:)↵
↵
↵
Now everyone could access rating [formulas](http://codeforces.net/blog/entry/20762), and there is some not obvious mathematic formulas. So, I decided to check probability formula(probability that the i-th participant has better result than the j-th participant)
↵
↵
↵
There was a lot of rating codeforces rounds, so it's easy to calculate this value by existing results. I choose cf rounds №200 — №350 (separately for each division). To solve this problem I wrote java program ([sources](https://github.com/WslF/CF_win_probability)). After getting results I copy/paste it to Excel and get plots:↵
↵
for first division↵
↵
↵
↵
for second division↵
↵
↵
↵
↵
Looks good, but lets try found something better:)↵
↵
↵
↵
Unfortunately this formula doesn't look scientific, so I a little bit change it:↵
↵
↵
↵
for second division↵
↵
↵
↵
Now it's closer:)
