Today I wanted to solve this problem: Heavy Intervals But I got TLE3 code: 260013398. that's why I changed the code a little bit and my code(260014069) was correct. But I don't understand how? Can you explain?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3831 |
3 | Radewoosh | 3646 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
4 | Benq | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | gamegame | 3386 |
10 | ksun48 | 3373 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 164 |
1 | maomao90 | 164 |
3 | Um_nik | 163 |
4 | atcoder_official | 160 |
5 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
6 | awoo | 157 |
7 | adamant | 156 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
8 | nor | 154 |
10 | Dominater069 | 153 |
Today I wanted to solve this problem: Heavy Intervals But I got TLE3 code: 260013398. that's why I changed the code a little bit and my code(260014069) was correct. But I don't understand how? Can you explain?
Name |
---|
b.upperbound takes $$$O(logn)$$$ while upperbound(all(b), a[i]) takes $$$O(n)$$$ time.
for sets , b.upper_bound is O(log(n)) but upper_bound(all(b)) is O(n)
Using set.upper_bound() is O(log n), while std::upper_bound(set.begin(), set.end(), value) adds O(n) complexity due to linear search, potentially causing time limit.