Look at these solutions: This one and this one . Is not it cheating? MikeMirzayanov what are you going to do against this?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3839 |
3 | Radewoosh | 3646 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
4 | Benq | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
7 | Geothermal | 3569 |
8 | ecnerwala | 3494 |
9 | Um_nik | 3396 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | Um_nik | 164 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 160 |
2 | maomao90 | 160 |
4 | atcoder_official | 158 |
4 | cry | 158 |
4 | awoo | 158 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | nor | 154 |
9 | TheScrasse | 153 |
10 | Dominater069 | 152 |
Look at these solutions: This one and this one . Is not it cheating? MikeMirzayanov what are you going to do against this?
Name |
---|
k
Why do you post this?
Codeforces are bad. You can cheat freely in it.
Your English are bad :(
*your english is bad :(
codeforces have s at the end so it should go with are :))
Edit : clearly my comment was not to provide true statement
Now I know that my english is very bad :(
If I'm not mistaken, we're allowed to used macros but not to obfuscate the code.
The first solution should be removed.
Sure, it is a cheating. I'll handle it.
Hey, didn't you notice the user above you?
Original solution: 77 ms
After obfuscation: 31 ms
So he did not try to cheat, he tried to make it faster.
Also the fun part is that he forgot to remove the first line with the original author's name.
C++11 takes less time than c++17
Hi Sir Is there proof for this? I am curious.
https://www.quora.com/Is-C-becoming-faster-or-slower-as-new-revisions-come-out-C-11-C-14-C-17-etc