Why so mainstream? the spinoff

Revision en1, by DanAlex, 2016-03-21 03:44:36

An intro would be also be kind of mainstream, but I'll still be...

Cutting to the chase

Rotations and balancing are kind of boring, but invariants are not. The nice thing about in looking for different solutions for the same problem is that you can find elegance in each of them. Maybe more importantly, it helps you develop backups when the first solution fails.

It is just the fact that sometimes to sell and start over is the right call. Of course, starting off with a small amount of one million dollars would do(couldn't help myself, people keep saying orange is the new black(now seriously: I say Donald, you say... Knuth))

History

 
 
 
 
Revisions
 
 
  Rev. Lang. By When Δ Comment
en19 English DanAlex 2017-08-08 03:32:22 7 Tiny change: 'n[cut]\n\nBinary' -> 'n[cut]\n\n\nBinary'
en18 English DanAlex 2017-08-08 03:27:34 9 Tiny change: 'uth)) \n\nBinary' -> 'uth)) \n\n[cut]\n\nBinary'
en17 English DanAlex 2016-03-22 03:06:15 106
en16 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 06:23:59 11 Tiny change: 'tree. \n\nPS \n----\n\nIn fac' -> 'tree. \n\n#### PS \n\nIn fac'
en15 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 06:23:38 3 Tiny change: 'ee. \n\nPS\n--\n\nIn f' -> 'ee. \n\nPS \n----\n\nIn f'
en14 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 06:23:12 0 Tiny change: '. \n\nPS\n--\n\nIn fac' -> '. \n\nPS\n\nIn fac'
en13 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 06:22:37 372 (published)
en12 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 06:19:25 364 Tiny change: ' a $O(log N)$ compl' -
en11 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 06:08:52 511
en10 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 05:50:57 978
en9 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 05:32:35 22
en8 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 05:32:05 4
en7 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 05:31:52 10
en6 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 05:31:16 212
en5 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 05:28:55 1836
en4 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 05:02:42 1261
en3 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 04:54:51 538
en2 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 04:31:22 2421
en1 English DanAlex 2016-03-21 03:44:36 692 Initial revision (saved to drafts)